Antonacci's Dual Momentum explained: relative and absolute momentum

Strategies · 6 min

In his book Dual Momentum Investing, Gary Antonacci proposed a simple idea: combine two momentum signals to decide where to invest.

The two signals

  1. Relative momentum. Which has returned more over the last 12 months, US equities or equities from the rest of the world? The winner is chosen.
  2. Absolute momentum. Has that winner returned more than Treasury bills (the risk-free alternative)? If not, it is not worth taking risk: switch to bonds.

The GEM portfolio in three lines

  • If SPY does not beat BIL over 12 months: 100% in bonds (AGG).
  • If it does: 100% in the better of SPY and ACWX.
  • One decision a month, with a single holding.

Check this month's signal on the Dual Momentum sheet: right now it points to ACWX.

What the numbers say

Since May 2009, with real ETFs, the backtest gives 9.4% a year with a maximum drawdown of -19.9%. Turnover is low (158% a year), which means few costs and few taxes.

Dual Momentum versus HAA

Dual Momentum (GEM) HAA Balanced
Assets held 1 4
Universe 3 ETFs + bonds 8 ETFs + 2 safe
Canary SPY versus BIL TIP
Turnover Low High
Diversification Minimal Greater

GEM's simplicity is its virtue, but being 100% in a single asset means a mistake hurts.

Limits

  • Slow signal: a 12-month window lags in fast drops.
  • Concentration: one ETF, one currency.
  • Whipsaws: in sideways markets it can switch assets several times, losing on each switch.

Frequently asked questions

Who is Gary Antonacci?

A US investor and researcher, author of Dual Momentum Investing (2014) and creator of Dual Momentum as a method.

Is GEM a good option for a beginner?

It is one of the easiest to understand and follow, but being all-or-nothing it can give significant scares. Read the risks first and compare it with passive portfolios.

How often does it switch assets?

A few times a year on average. It depends on the market.

Educational and informational content. It is not investment advice or a personal recommendation. The results shown are historical simulations (backtests) using US-listed ETFs; past performance does not guarantee future results and you may lose some or all of the capital invested. Real returns will depend on your costs, taxes, currency and execution timing.