Three-fund portfolio (Bogleheads)

Three total-market index funds (US stocks, international stocks and bonds) and one real decision - how much to put in each. No signals, no monthly changes.

What the three-fund portfolio is

It is an index portfolio with three pieces: one fund that buys nearly every listed US company, another that does the same for companies outside the US, and a third holding bonds from the whole US market. Funds that cover an entire market, from large companies to small, are called total-market funds. You buy them once and leave them.

The idea is spread by the Bogleheads investor community. According to their wiki, Taylor Larimore already described the approach in a 1999 post on the Morningstar forums. There is no paper or book with closed rules: it is a community convention, so it pays to look at what it does and does not say. It says there are three asset classes held through total-market funds. It does not say what percentage goes to each.

The weights are our choice. The wiki leaves the split between stocks and bonds, and between the US and international, to each investor. To be able to run a backtest we fixed one, explain it below and declare it as an editorial decision of the site.

Quick facts

Author
Bogleheads community; popularised by Taylor Larimore
Year
n/a
Origin
Community
Access
Public and free
Type
Passive
Assets
3
Frequency
Annual
Difficulty
Low
CAGR
7.8%
since Mar 2011
Max drawdown
-21.0%
S&P 500: -51%
Volatility
9.2%
S&P 500: 14.7%
Sharpe
0.71
S&P 500: 0.72

Who it is for

Anyone who wants a simple index portfolio with three products and one review a year, and accepts that it will rise and fall with the markets.

Who it is not for

Anyone trying to beat the market, anyone who needs an "official" split, or anyone who cannot stand double-digit drops in their portfolio.

When it fits

For an investor with a long horizon who prefers few pieces, tolerates the drops of a portfolio with 60% in stocks and wants to review it once a year. The specific mix between stocks and bonds depends on the person and their situation, and this page cannot decide it. It does not suit anyone who needs a portfolio with closed rules from an author, or who wants to limit drops with signals.

Current signal

Current portfolio

Bogleheads Three-Fund Portfolio

Annual rebalancing
VTI 42%BND 40%VXUS 18%
VTI US total stock market42.0%
BND US aggregate bonds40.0%
VXUS International stocks ex-US18.0%

Calculated with the closes of September 30, 2026.

No portfolio changes from last month.

Rules, step by step

The portfolio has no signals. You set it up once, add or withdraw funds as needed and return it to the starting weights every so often. With the site's weights:

Fund (US ETF) What it covers Weight
VTI Total US stock market 42%
VXUS Total stock market outside the US 18%
BND US bond market (aggregate) 40%
  1. Set the bond weight. The wiki gives as a common guideline a bond share close to the investor's age, and leaves it as a personal decision. We use 40%, which leaves 60% in equities.
  2. Split the equities between the US and international. The wiki says Vanguard raised its international weight reference from 20% to 30% in 2010 and to 40% in 2015. We take 30%: of that 60% in stocks, 30% goes outside the US (18% of the portfolio) and the rest to the US (42%).
  3. Rebalance every so often. The wiki suggests doing it infrequently, for example once a year. In the backtest we do it every December.
  4. In between, touch nothing. There is nothing to calculate between rebalances.

An example with numbers

With $10,000 the starting portfolio is $4,200 in VTI, $1,800 in VXUS and $4,000 in BND. Suppose, as an invented example, that in one year equities rise to a combined $7,200 and bonds stay at $4,000. The portfolio is worth $11,200 and a 40% bond share would be $4,480. Rebalancing means selling $480 of stocks and buying bonds with it, keeping the internal 70/30 split of the equities. If instead of selling you prefer to add new money, you direct it to the funds below their weight and end up in the same place without selling.

Backtest and out-of-sample period

With real ETFs from Mar 2011 to Sep 2026, rebalancing every December and a cost of 0.1% per trade, the site's version returns 7.8% a year, with a maximum monthly drawdown of -21.0%, volatility of 9.2% and a Sharpe of 0.71. The best year was 2019 (+20.3%) and the worst, 2022 (-16.3%). On average it turns over 6% of the portfolio a year.

The S&P 500 bought and held, measured from Mar 1993, gives 10.8% a year with a maximum drawdown of 51%. It is not a clean comparison: it starts earlier and goes through 2008. To see both over the same dates, change the period selector in the table below.

Four precautions about these numbers:

  • The history is short. VXUS, the total-market international ETF, has existed since 2011. Earlier we would have had to use substitutes, and we have not done so.
  • There is no deep stock market crisis in the period. 2000-2002 and 2008 are left out, so the maximum drawdown you see is not a ceiling on what can happen.
  • The weights are ours. Another mix (more bonds, more or less international) would give other numbers.
  • It is before taxes. Trading costs are included, taxes are not.

Since it is a portfolio with no parameters to tune, there is no "out-of-sample" period to separate.

Growth of $100 (logarithmic scale) since , with 0.1% costs per trade. Data: US-listed ETFs, total return (dividends reinvested), before taxes.

Drawdowns from peak

StrategyCAGRVolatilityMax drawdownSharpe

Year by year

YearThree-fund portfolio (Bogleheads)S&P 50060/40
2026 (to Sep 2026)+6.6%+12.7%+5.8%
2025+15.8%+17.7%+13.8%
2024+11.5%+24.9%+14.7%
2023+16.1%+26.2%+17.2%
2022-16.3%-18.2%-17.0%
2021+11.7%+28.7%+15.9%
2020+13.8%+18.3%+15.0%
2019+20.3%+31.2%+21.9%
2018-4.8%-4.6%-2.4%
2017+15.4%+21.7%+14.0%
2016+7.3%+12.0%+7.6%
2015-0.4%+1.2%+1.3%
2014+6.7%+13.5%+11.7%
2013+15.8%+32.3%+16.9%
2012+11.4%+16.0%+11.1%
2011-2.1%+1.9%+7.4%

The first year may be partial. Returns are net of trading costs.

Taxes on rotating

The results above are before taxes. This portfolio is rebalanced once a year: historically it turns over only 6% of the portfolio a year on average, so it generates few sales.

In most countries each sale of an ETF in a taxable account realises a gain or loss that may be taxed, so rotating monthly is best done inside a tax-advantaged account (such as an IRA or 401(k) in the US, or an ISA or SIPP in the UK) where one is available. Rules vary by country and by account: check yours, or ask a tax adviser. See our methodology for how the results are calculated.

Criticisms and limits

The structure comes from the community, but the weights do not. The wiki leaves the split to the investor, so the figures on this page correspond to the version we chose (60% equities, 40% bonds, 30% of the equities abroad) and not to "the" portfolio. The ETF history starts in 2011 and includes no serious stock market crisis.

Strengths

  • Few products. Three total-market funds cover US stocks and bonds and the rest of the world's stocks without having to pick companies or sectors.
  • Almost nothing to decide. Once the weights are set, the work is one review a year.
  • Minimal turnover, which matters for taxes when buying with ETFs.
  • Easy to audit. Anyone can check in a minute whether their portfolio has drifted from the weights.

Limits and criticisms

  • There are no canonical weights. This is the main limitation recorded in our specification sheet: the result depends entirely on the chosen split. Any figure you see published corresponds to a specific version.
  • Bonds do not always cushion. In 2022 the portfolio fell 16.3% over the year, with stocks and bonds falling together.
  • Only about fifteen years of ETF history, with no long stock market crisis inside it.
  • Total market does not mean invulnerable. The portfolio follows the market, including when it falls.

How to run it

  1. Decide your weights. Those on this sheet are a starting point, not a personal recommendation.
  2. Find a product for each piece: a fund or ETF for US (or global) stocks, another for non-US stocks (or the international part of a global fund) and another for bonds.
  3. Set an annual rebalancing date and write it down.
  4. In a taxable account, each sale may realise a gain; directing new contributions to the funds below target avoids selling.
  5. To work out the orders, use the rebalancing calculator.

Work out this month's orders →

Similar strategies

See all strategies → · Compare them →

Frequently asked questions

What weights does this site use for the three-fund portfolio?

42% in VTI (total US market), 18% in VXUS (international stocks) and 40% in BND (bonds). It is our choice: 60/40 with 30% of the equities outside the US. The Bogleheads wiki does not fix a single split.

How many bonds should I hold?

There is no general answer. The wiki gives as a common guideline a bond share close to the investor's age, but it is only a reference. It depends on the horizon and how much of a drop is tolerated, and it is a personal decision.

How much international stock should it have?

That is not fixed either. The wiki recalls that Vanguard raised its reference from 20% to 30% in 2010 and to 40% in 2015, which shows there is no consensus. We use 30% of the equities.

How does it differ from the 60/40 portfolio?

This site's [60/40](/en/strategies/cartera-60-40/) uses two assets (the S&P 500 and IEF). The three-fund portfolio keeps a 60/40 split but divides the stocks into US and international and uses aggregate bonds instead of 7-10 year Treasuries.

How often is it rebalanced?

The wiki proposes doing it occasionally, for example once a year. We do it at the end of December. With regular contributions you can rebalance by directing them to whatever is below target.

Is this investment advice?

No. It is educational information about a community portfolio. Backtests and past performance do not guarantee future results, and you can lose money.

Sources and review date

Page last reviewed on October 11, 2026; figures and signal are recalculated at every monthly close (latest: September 30, 2026). How we work: editorial policy and methodology.

Educational and informational content. It is not investment advice or a personal recommendation. The results shown are historical simulations (backtests) using US-listed ETFs; past performance does not guarantee future results and you may lose some or all of the capital invested. Real returns will depend on your costs, taxes, currency and execution timing.